Ghadir's sermon is one of the most important sermons of the Holy Prophet which presented as a "Velayat" Discourse in the social sphere of that day,Because of the coherence of the spirit and the soul of the Prophet with the Holy Qur'an this sermon is heavily influenced by the Holy Qur'an. The verse 67 of the Sura Ma'edah, known as the "Propaganda Verse", Due to the consensus of the Shiites and the Sunnis on having the verse assigned to Ghadir is one of the most important verses in the sermon therefore, Discourse analysis as a new Method that addresses the meaning of the text and its underlying layers, is important in examining these verses. In this project, using Practical Discourse Analysis Method (PDAM), based on Islamic insight, examines verse 67 of the Sura Ma'edah five spaces: structural, semantic, communicative, discursive, and meta-Discourse. And its basic axes were identified and it was also explained that this Discourse, in contrast to the hypocritical Discourse, considers the "Velayat" a divine status. And the "Velayat" as central to this Discourse indicates that the great mission of the Prophet and the religion of Islam is the flow of the "Velayat", not the law, so it does not end with the end of the noble life of the Prophet.

In "Modern poetics", what is important is the "text" and its internal essence. Some of the most controversial issues in poetics are related to "Discourse" and "Discourse Analysis". In order for a text to be fully understood for basic elements of a language, music, imagery, and human experience (emotional structure), and also the intertextuality issue should be taken into account.

Discourse analysis, is an interdisciplinary approach that has its roots in linguistics. The term is used by “Zlykhrys" for the first time. The main goal of Discourse analysis is to find the new technique in the study of texts, media, culture, science, politics, and society.The approach of critical Discourse analysis is developmental of Discourse analysis in linguistic studies which from individual and Methodological points of view has upgraded the Discourse analysis from description of texts to explanation level. In critical Discourse analysis, the critique of ideology and power is considered more than the other types of Discourse analysis. This article has sought the introduction of critical Discourse analysis and the well-known theorists in this field.

In "Modern poetics”, “the text” is considered as the literature’s internal essence. In other words, just the dominant side of literary work is of nobility, the belief that comes from structuralism. Some of the most controversial issues in poetics are related to "Discourse" and "Discourse Analysis". In order for a text to be fully understood, five basic elements including language, music, imagery, human experience (emotional structure), and also the intertextuality issue should be taken into account. There is no doubt that this Method has found its way from linguistics and played an important role in literary criticism. In contemporary Arabic inquiries the word ”khatab” is equivalent of “Discourse”. On the other hand, Sohrab Sepehry is a stylist poet who has become a top one among his contemporaries, and synchronic has reached a prominent point in his works. In this article Sepehry’s poem that is fluctuating between nature and super natural is studied descriptively and analytically according to Discourse analysis Method.

Today, given the increase in the theoretical criticisms of positivistic approach, many scientists of social and human sciences emphasize on the qualitative Methods of research instead of gathering quantitative data and statistical analyses. One of the widespread Methods of qualitative research is critical Discourse analysis. Philosophically, critical Discourse analysis based on structuralism reduces reality into human structures by emphasising on human agency. Referring to the logical requirements of structuralist foundations of critical Discourse analysis, the present paper concludes that epistemologically this approach leads to relativism, sophistry and negation of cognition, axiological relativity, self-contradiction, refusal of truth and falsity, and refusal of ethics.

Architecture criticism is a multidiscipline topic which usually related to level of success in meeting a prosperous architecture, or at least meeting the designers’ objectives. The criticism procedures should satisfy the needs of all the stakeholders who participate in architectural design process. Criticism has a lot to do with a wide range of tangible and intangible issues such as environmental, social, technical, economic, aesthetic and fictional issues. Therefore performance-based criticism is an approach to evaluate architect's success in meeting aims and objectives of all the stakeholders who might be interested in the project. It is essential to explain that the level of architectural performance is affected by “context”. Moreover high-performance architecture might be crystalized through the relationship of form and content. This paper is to make a framework for Discourse of high-performance architecture in order to shape a Method to understand contemporary architecture. As well as make a substantive model to criticize strength and weakness on contemporary architecture, especially contemporary architecture of developing countries such as Iran. Contrary to much of conventional approaches, architecture criticism not only study building beyond the way it performed but also prefer to analyze hidden dimensions of architectural design process.Theoretical framework of the paper is based on understanding architecture as a comprehensive Discourse. Assumption of the research indicates that architecture is a matter of Discourse and comprehensive meaning of high-performance architecture might be understood by adopting the relationship between architecture and architect as a critical Discourse.It is essential to describe performance-based design as way to meet demands and expectation of all the stakeholders in architectural design process, especially in programing and planning phase.The research Methodology of the paper is based on Discourse analysis theory in order to explain the relationship between architecture and context as matter of understanding the level of performance. Moreover the research Methodology aims at revealing socio-cultural, ultra mundane, intangible and psychological characteristics of “architecture” rather than tangible and physical issues.The results of the paper show that a comprehensive approach toward architecture criticism includes five categories: 1- Relation to Context: high-performance architecture has to crystalize a meaningful learning from nature. The interrelationship of performative characteristics of architecture, recombinant materials and socio-cultural aspects of design.2- Process-Based Approach: Understanding the level of performance is to concentrate on process in order to meet stakeholders’ demands and objectives.3- General Welcoming: Performance-based design has a lot to do with collective mind.4- Recriticizing Critics of Critics: Architecture might be read in contemporary Discourses.Architects sometimes have their own approach toward architecture criticism which might be called designerly way of knowing and doing which works as a new style of architectural criticism.5- Redevelopment of Future Discourse: New architectural technologies such as digitalism, prefabrication, biotechnology, recycled materials, mathematical architecture etc. are about to shape a new paradigm for future architecture. Based on theoretical developments future legacy in architecture is in need of a kind of ethno-futuristic Discourse. It is essential to redevelop future Discourse in programing architecture in order to understand high-performance architecture.

current research is to critically analyze the Discourse of world peace in the textbooks of the Iranian educational system based on the theory of identification by L& M. For this purpose, the textbooks between the years 1357-1392 (primary period and first period high school) have been analyzed. This article has been done with the combined Method of analyzing the Discourse of Fairclough, L &M and focusing on the following questions: What was the status of the world peace Discourse in the educational documents of this era? What subjects are these educational materials trying to create? What role have the dominant political Discourses in this era played in shaping the identity of these subjects? The findings show that the Discourse of world peace in educational books and documents has been rejected due to the demarcation between Islamic and non-Islamic, internal and external. Power processes have tried to create militant and vengeful subjects with a military identity. The factor of persuasion of the subjects is the axiomatization of the ideologies of the revolution with an Islamic nature. Also, the educational content by inducing specific defense ideologies has formed pacifist identities in all individual, interpersonal, social and international dimensions.

In this paper, it will be argued that, contrary to the prevailing practice in Iran from the mid-1990s to the present, Michel Foucault's Discourse Analysis (FDA) cannot be used separatelyas a mere Method in various fields of humanities andwithout considering its philosophical-ideological bases. FDA stems from his particular ideological perspective of the course of modern times from the renaissance to the end of the enlightenment (14th to the 18th century) and derives from particular philosophical and ontological sources that Foucault deeply believed them. In other words, there is an organic unity between FDA, as a Method, and its philosophical content, and the fact that Foucault turned to Discourse Analysis and adopted it as a seemingly new Method in analyzing the history of the new age was notarbitrary but a deliberate choice. In fact, it came from his own philosophical logic,alogic that is consistent with G. W. F. Hegelian historicism, which Foucault ostensibly opposed. Hegelianism, with its deterministic logic, develops an organic view of history that is consistent with Foucault's structural and institutional view of power. . On the other hand, Hegelian historicism does not place importance on the role of humans in the formation of historical events, and this feature is also fully compatible with Foucault's theory of the subject's death. Thus, one can use Foucault's Discourse analysis only as a Method of analyzing various subjects if one firmly believes in its ideological foundations, such as the death of man.

Foucault introduces a new way of analysis of the social world while he does not make clear how to conduct research. However, it does not mean that Foucault did not leave any space to do a Foucauldian social research (or as he wishes, doing genealogies). Indeed, the manner of Foucauldian social research is an ongoing Method (s) which is produced both by Foucault and a researcher. The researcher must read Foucault and then draw out some basic points on which she or he can establish a concrete research Method. While he mainly focuses on the internal side of Discourse and is uninterested in non-discursive elements in archaeology, he then shifts to an overall view in his genealogical works in which discursive and non-discursive elements lose their significant differences, and they are mingled in each other in a Discourse. In this article I will map Foucault’s main theoretical and Methodological points and articulate them in my own Method of doing a research. In so doing, I touch on general aspects of Discourse and Discourse analysis, then I will describe Foucault’s Method, next I will illuminate how practically to do a Discourse analysis.